Microarrays Research Today is a free monthly online journal that collates and summarizes the latest research about Microarrays, including details on experiments, designs, statistics, analysis, software. | ||||||||
|
Using Generalized Procrustes Analysis (GPA) for normalization of cDNA microarray data.Xiong H, Zhang D, Martyniuk CJ, Trudeau VL, Xia X
ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Normalization is essential in dual-labelled microarray data analysis to remove non-biological variations and systematic biases. Many normalization methods have been used to remove such biases within slides (Global, Lowess) and across slides (Scale, Quantile and VSN). However, all these popular approaches have critical assumptions about data distribution, which is often not valid in practice. RESULTS: In this study, we propose a novel assumption-free normalization method based on the Generalized Procrustes Analysis (GPA) algorithm. Using experimental and simulated normal microarray data and boutique array data, we systemically evaluate the ability of the GPA method in normalization compared with six other popular normalization methods including Global, Lowess, Scale, Quantile, VSN, and one boutique array-specific housekeeping gene method. The assessment of these methods is based on three different empirical criteria: across-slide variability, the Kolmogorov-Smirnov (K-S) statistic and the mean square error (MSE). Compared with other methods, the GPA method performs effectively and consistently better in reducing across-slide variability and removing systematic bias. CONCLUSIONS: The GPA method is an effective normalization approach for microarray data analysis In particular, it is free from the statistical and biological assumptions inherent in the other normalization methods that are often difficult to validate. Therefore, the GPA method has a major advantage in that it can applied to diverse types of array sets, but especially the boutique array where the majority of genes may be differentially expressed. Published 17 January 2008 in BMC Bioinformatics, 9(1): 25.
© 2004-2008 Microarrays Research Today. All Rights Reserved. |
| ||||||